1
1
Sonic Attack on a Silent Vigil [electronic resource].
Title & Author:

Sonic Attack on a Silent Vigil [electronic resource].

Publication:

Earshot 2025

Restrictions:

Open access content

Notes:
Standard Copyright
Summary:

In the aftermath of the alleged sonic attack on protestors engaged in a silent vigil in Belgrade, Serbia, on 15 March 2025, Earshot has undertaken a comprehensive analysis of the audio content of 19 videos, conducted 15 in-depth Earwitness interviews with protestors positioned along Kralja Milana Boulevard, and aggregated more than 3,000 written statements from the vigil’s attendees. The findings of this investigation concludes it is highly likely protestors were subjected to a targeted attack using a directional acoustic weapon and contradicts the claims made in a report by the Federal Security Service (FSB) of the Russian Federation and Serbian authorities that the ‘disorders’ began with ‘devices’ such as fireworks, and other implications that protestors’ reactions were merely a response to a sound generated by the crowd. This conclusion is based on the following findings: 1) Witnesses demonstrated clear analytical capacity during the event: they were able to distinguish between different sounds and assess their surroundings, contradicting claims that the panic was triggered by crowd-generated noise or otherwise explainable acoustic triggers, such as fireworks. 2) While the FSB report states that the crowd movement “can only be achieved through coordination by organisers within a crowd and is not possible with a brief use of a special device.”, Earshot’s findings demonstrate how this claim is demonstrably false when reviewing the capacities of the LRAD 450XL in its user manual. This device was known to both be present that night and to be in the possession of the Serbian police. 3) A high level of consistency and cross-corroboration was observed across the 15 earwitness interviews and the analysed 3,244 written statements. This consistency enabled the reconstruction of the anomalous sound heard during the vigil. 4) The absence of the sound on recorded devices could indicate, rather than disqualify, the use of an LRAD-like device given the specific and patented mec
https://www.librarystack.org/sonic-attack-on-a-silent-vigil/?ref=unknown

Resources:
Item Resolution URL
Subject:

Space (Architecture)
Field Recording
Hearing
Sound
Violence

Form/genre:

Text

Added entries:

Earshot
Lawrence Abu Hamdan
Fabio Claudio Cervi
Caline Matar
Adnan Naqvi

Actions:
1
1

Sign up to get news from us

Email address
First name
Last name
By signing up you agree to receive our newsletter and communications about CCA activities. You can unsubscribe at any time. For more information, consult our privacy policy or contact us.

Thank you for signing up. You'll begin to receive emails from us shortly.

We’re not able to update your preferences at the moment. Please try again later.

You’ve already subscribed with this email address. If you’d like to subscribe with another, please try again.

This email was permanently deleted from our database. If you’d like to resubscribe with this email, please contact us

Please complete the form below to buy:
[Title of the book, authors]
ISBN: [ISBN of the book]
Price [Price of book]

First name
Last name
Address (line 1)
Address (line 2) (optional)
Postal code
City
Country
Province/state
Email address
Phone (day) (optional)
Notes

Thank you for placing an order. We will contact you shortly.

We’re not able to process your request at the moment. Please try again later.

Folder ()

Your folder is empty.

Email:
Subject:
Notes:
Please complete this form to make a request for consultation. A copy of this list will also be forwarded to you.

Your contact information
First name:
Last name:
Email:
Phone number:
Notes (optional):
We will contact you to set up an appointment. Please keep in mind that your consultation date will be based on the type of material you wish to study. To prepare your visit, we'll need:
  • — At least 2 weeks for primary sources (prints and drawings, photographs, archival documents, etc.)
  • — At least 48 hours for secondary sources (books, periodicals, vertical files, etc.)
...