Let us assure you

Architecture can often find itself in service of a message: this institution is trustworthy or forward-thinking; that individual or company is powerful; here is a world you want to buy into. This topic looks at examples of the built environment as a kind of public relations strategy. In unpacking the ways that architecture—and, equally importantly, representations of it—lays claims and exerts influence, we might better understand the versions of reality that architecture proposes to us.

Article 15 of 16

Hang the Architect

Text by Nicolas Gaudreau

Unnumbered plate: The manner of building Bridges, Secure on Piles, as Westminster Bridge ought to have been Built, in Batty Langley, A survey of Westminster Bridge, 1748. 5868

Batty Langley (1696–1751), the writer of numerous volumes on garden architecture, was familiar with the rhetorical power of images, and knew how to use them to make his name in the competitive world of architectural publishing. His most famous work, New Principles of Gardening (1728), made him a pioneer in the use of ruins in gardens and provides eloquent proof of the power of images. The tome’s plates depict colossal ruins whose monumental character is more than a little reminiscent of certain Piranesi etchings.

Another example of Langley’s taste for powerful images is found in A survey of Westminster Bridge as ‘tis now sinking into ruin … with remarks on the piratical method used for building the piers and a just estimate of the expence for which all their foundations might have been made secure with piles, until every stone, with which the bridge is built, was torn into atoms by the hungry teeth of devouring time… (1748). This work bears more relation to curiosities and genre literature than it does to scholarly or technical writing. In effect, it is a broadside in which Langley savages the builder of the new Westminster Bridge, Charles Labelye (1705–1781), an engineer of Swiss origin. Labelye had sparked an angry, xenophobic backlash when he was selected ahead of Langley and all other English bidders for the contract. When the piers started showing worrisome subsidence before workers had even finished building the bridge, Langley saw an irresistible opportunity to pounce.

The most unusual aspect of Langley’s diatribe is a simple drawing printed near the front of the book—its only illustration. The drawing portrayed the imagined hanging of the bridge’s incompetent architect. While such a drawing may seem out of place in an engineering book, it was in fact perfectly normal in an environment in which personal attacks were common currency. It is also possible to situate Langley’s cruel drawing in the wider context of English satirical drawing, of which the architect here appears to be an avid practitioner.

Nicolas Gaudreau was a recipient of a CCA Collection Research Grant in 2004 and contributed this text to our website in 2010.


Sign up to get news from us

Email address
First name
Last name
By signing up you agree to receive our newsletter and communications about CCA activities. You can unsubscribe at any time. For more information, consult our privacy policy or contact us.

Thank you for signing up. You'll begin to receive emails from us shortly.

We’re not able to update your preferences at the moment. Please try again later.

You’ve already subscribed with this email address. If you’d like to subscribe with another, please try again.

This email was permanently deleted from our database. If you’d like to resubscribe with this email, please contact us

Please complete the form below to buy:
[Title of the book, authors]
ISBN: [ISBN of the book]
Price [Price of book]

First name
Last name
Address (line 1)
Address (line 2) (optional)
Postal code
Email address
Phone (day) (optional)

Thank you for placing an order. We will contact you shortly.

We’re not able to process your request at the moment. Please try again later.

Folder ()

Your folder is empty.

Please complete this form to make a request for consultation. A copy of this list will also be forwarded to you.

Your contact information
First name:
Last name:
Phone number:
Notes (optional):
We will contact you to set up an appointment. Please keep in mind that your consultation date will be based on the type of material you wish to study. To prepare your visit, we'll need:
  • — At least 2 weeks for primary sources (prints and drawings, photographs, archival documents, etc.)
  • — At least 48 hours for secondary sources (books, periodicals, vertical files, etc.)