1
1
Fr
A history of references

The attitudes to history evident in the work of specific architects, historical and contemporary, form our focus here. We want to look back, but with a mind to the present and future, to understand how history has been used today and in history. Referencing, quoting, copying, stealing, rejecting—these are all ways of dealing with what came before us, and we’re interested in how architects take a position in relation to the past in order to produce work that’s relevant for their time.

Article 7 of 9

The Giudecca Project

Text by Rafael Moneo

Álvaro Siza’s project for Giudecca is, as always, a sign of intelligence.

Siza’s profound sense of reality is reflected in his respect for the neighbourhood where he intervenes, for the people who occupy it—for what is built, in a word. It is something that prompts him, on this occasion, to forego the appeal that the new always offers. Siza understood that he should not affect the lives of the local people and that he therefore had to respect the character, the spirit of the architecture of Giudecca, which, first of all, meant accepting the dimensional order according to which it was built.

Old plans show us how the occupants of San Giorgio Maggiore laid out their dwellings in calli perpendicular to the fundamenta that looks toward Venice. Giudecca was colonized through calli. By means of modern slab blocks, present-day heirs to the Siedlungen, Siza thought Giudecca’s housing needs could be answered. Siza’s entire intervention stems from something as simple as this: the discovery that modern housing slabs can coexist with Giudecca’s old construction. Respect for the morphology, not the type, lies at the source of the project. Aymonino and Rossi’s built projects seem to advocate the opposite: typology over urban form.1

Hence the layout of the competition proposal, with its attention to the alignment of buildings and introduction of an open space, like a campo, which becomes a prominent urban element that ultimately characterizes the intervention—limited, sadly, to just half of what the competition entry had envisaged. Access to this campo is not left to chance; it is organized by means of a cleft produced by the offset alignment of the slabs, an opening in the dihedron where a blind wall configures a square enclosure, a small plaza. Campo and plaza, defined by two different dimensional orders, generate a concatenation of spaces to which Siza ultimately entrusts the architectural experience. Which subtly eliminates any temptation to see the campo as a cortile, a closed space.

A minimal but extraordinarily effective intervention to transform the neighbourhood, in which the hermetic houses Siza built are incorporated without any pretension to be seen, in an example of Siza’s sense of reality, and his powerful intelligence.


  1. Several of the architects who participated in the 1983 competition for the Campo di Marte urban plan were asked to contribute buildings in the context of Siza’s winning design: Carlo Aymonino, Aldo Rossi, Moneo, and Siza himself. Aymonino’s and Rossi’s buildings were ultimately completed in 2004; after another delay, Siza’s was realized in 2016. Moneo’s contribution has not yet been built. 

Unknown photographer. Campo di Marte, Giudecca, Venice, between 1983 and 1986. Álvaro Siza fonds, CCA. ARCH279575

Unknown photographer. Campo di Marte, Giudecca, Venice, between 1983 and 1986. Álvaro Siza fonds, CCA. ARCH279576

We asked Rafael Moneo to write this text during the opening of the Venice Architecture Biennale in May 2016.

1
1

Sign up to get news from us

Email address
First Name
Last Name

Thank you for signing up. You'll begin to receive emails from us shortly.

We’re not able to update your preferences at the moment. Please try again later.

You’ve already subscribed with this email address. If you’d like to subscribe with another, please try again.

Folder ()

Your folder is empty.

Email:
Subject:
Notes:
Please complete this form to make a request for consultation. A copy of this list will also be forwarded to you.

Your contact information
First name:
Last name:
Email:
Phone number:
Notes (optional):
We will contact you to set up an appointment. Please keep in mind that your consultation date will be based on the type of material you wish to study. To prepare your visit, we'll need:
  • — At least one week for primary sources (prints and drawings, photographs, archival documents, etc.)
  • — At least twenty-four hours for secondary sources (books, periodicals, vertical files, etc.)
...